About Me

Name:ConservativeStudent
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Presidential Candidates in Debt

In 2008, primary and general election voters will be looking to see who can lead the United States of America morally, militarily, and among other qualifications, financially. In my opinion, candidates for President should have a working knowledge of a budget, regardless if it is the budget of a family, city, state, or international event. They should especially understand how not to spend more money than they have acquired. Without further ado, here are the Presidential candidates with the most debt owed by their campaign committee:

  • Most Debt
    10) CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON: $319,630
    9) EDWARDS, JOHN: $333,586
    8) KUCINICH, DENNIS J: $445,500
    7) KEYES, ALAN L: $524,068
    6) OBAMA, BARACK: $922,848
    5) COX, JOHN H: $935,000
    4) MCCAIN, JOHN S: $1,783,523
    3) CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM: $3,026,522
    2) LAROUCHE, LYNDON H JR: $3,247,576
    1) ROMNEY, MITT: $8,945,028


  • In the 2007-2008 election cycle, no Presidential campaign listed above has paid a single, red, American penny towards paying off their debt. This fact is not only disturbing, but it is frightening to think we want these men, woman, or family to run our economy.

    Other honorable candidates worth mentioning include:


  • Honorable Mention
    12) CLARK, WESLEY K: $244,917
    13) HATCH, ORRIN GRANT: $158,974
    15) VILSACK, THOMAS J: $148,123
    16) GILMORE, JAMES S III: $128,927
    17) THOMPSON, TOMMY G: $127,434
    20) NADER, RALPH: $100,000
    24) GRAVEL, MIKE: $64,715
    25) SHARKEY, JONATHON THE IMPALER $63,489
    26) RICHARDSON, BILL: $61,104
    28) HUCKABEE, MIKE: $31,044
    29) DEAN, HOWARD $30,358
    32) TANCREDO, THOMAS GERALD $15,000
    41) GEPHARDT, RICHARD A $3,202


  • $0 of Debt
    BAYH, EVAN
    BIDEN, JOSEPH R JR
    BROWNBACK, SAMUEL DALE
    BUCHANAN, PATRICK J
    BUSH, GEORGE W PRES
    DODD, CHRISTOPHER J
    GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W
    HUNTER, DUNCAN
    KERRY, JOHN F (Had a -$6,949,956 net receipts)
    LIEBERMAN, JOSEPH I
    PAUL, RON
    SANDERS, COLONEL LAUNEIL

  • As Conservatives, we believe that the government should be run effectively and efficiently, just as any business or home owner would rationally expect. These numbers are a sure indicator to what we may see in the future when one of these individuals is running our country.

    David A. Ferguson is President of the American Conservative Student Union. He can be reached at President@ConservativeStudent.org

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Liberals Inviting Revolution

    communist


    Over the past several months, I have had the distinct pleasure of attending several Left-of-Left student events around the country. And as for these Liberals, I have gained serious respect for their movement. I have no respect for their very Clintonesque ideology, but there seems to be a looming power in their numbers. The current generation's radical form of liberalism will be a formidable political force in the near future.

    Throughout a calendar year, thousands of students flock to various campuses across America to see how to better enact change for the advancement of radical communism, socialism, and liberalism on individual campuses. Sure these students may be eating out of dumpsters, backpacking across the country, and resting wherever they may fall, but the leaders of the left are serious about changing America for better or worse.

    Cracking down on capitalism, opening the borders of the world, and allowing the government to care for those in need all seem to be popular topics for discussion. But, one strand of thought I found among these liberals was the urge for armed struggle to overthrow the government of the United States of America, replace it with an overarching Utopia of government dependence so the individual lives with no consequence or responsibility except to the community. These ideas are frightening, but they are real.

    These militantly liberal students have not been taking the advice of the teacher, Karl Marx. He thought these changes can be enacted inside a current political system. In 1848, Marx also laid out his 10 planks of Communism:

    1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.
    2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
    3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
    4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
    5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
    6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State.
    7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
    8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
    9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
    10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form.


    How many of these ideas are currently enacted in some way, shape, or form in the "Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave?" Actually all 10 are currently at work, today, in the United States of America. Limited government should no longer be a slogan, but yet a platform with a plan.


    A week or so back, former Governor Romney said, "Hillary Clinton just gave a speech the other day about her view on the economy. She said we have been an on-your-own society. She said it's time to get rid of that and replace that with shared responsibility and we're-in-it-together society...That's out with Adam Smith and in with Karl Marx."


    The students who were once leaders in the local chapter of Students for a Democratic Society and other left-winged groups are now University administration and faculty. In 2007-2008, Conservative students should be challenging these professors who want to end social, individual, and economic liberty.


    When the Berlin Wall came crashing down, Communism did not fall with it, but yet, internationally, it only stumbled. I agree with the Governor. Along with the uphill battle of liberal indoctrination, those who sugar cote the community message as a power grab, and the subtle movements of a transient American bell curve, this socialist agenda is closer than we may want to believe. It is time we open our eyes to see the pending danger of Big Brother's government before it is too late.




    David Ferguson serves as President of the American Conservative Student Union. He can be reached at President@ConservativeStudent.org.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Pork on a Platter

    On April 11, 2007, Citizens Against Government Waste released the 2007 Prime Cuts of the Federal Budget. Prime cuts "arms citizens, legislators, and the media with a specific, rational, and achievable menus for downsizing the government." This is the type of weapon the Conservative Movement needs to wage a war on our large and secretive federal government. One can find CAGW's Prime Cuts at this website (http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reports_primecuts).

    Prime cuts makes 750 recommendations that would save American taxpayers $280 billion a year and over $2 Trillion over the next five years. Prime Cuts includes examples of agencies, programs, and policies that are plagued by fraud or negligence, serve political or parochial interests rather than the general good, do not demonstrate results, duplicate efforts in the private sector, circumvent procedural checks for transparency and accountability, or exceed their original mandate.

    The notion of politics as a war is rarely given kind attention, especially in a city like Washington, DC driven by collectivism, compromise, and cronyism. But, the truth of the matter is that politics is a war. Transparency is a weapon for Conservatism, and Prime Cuts might as well be our AK-47. Easy to use, reliable, and straightforward. So much so, that a child can use it and understand the importance of the task at hand. Frivolous overspending is a problem facing the United States of America, and Citizens Against Government Waste is here with solutions.

    For more information please visit www.CAGW.org.

    David A. Ferguson is President of the American Conservative Student Union. He can be reached at President@ConservativeStudent.org.
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Counter-Response, 'Another Bush Failure'

    Original Post from http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20362

    On Monday, April 16, 2007, the White House responded to my article entitled "Another Bush Failure." On April 5, 2007, I wrote that the AMERICAN 2007 National Drug Control Strategy from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) was a failure because of its lack of attention on problems originating in Mexico. The response from the White House merely reiterates the original ONDCP Strategy, and doesn’t answer our documented criticisms. Perhaps we need to focus our arguments more more clearly. "Another Bush Failure " mentions this particular criticism:

    "In my personal opinion John P. Walters, Director of the Office National Drug Control Policy, should resign or be replaced. He is not seriously looking out for the sovereignty and national security of the United States of America by leaving the swinging gate to our country open for business. Nor is he preserving, protecting, nor defending "We the People" against foreign threats of drug trafficking nor the domestic threats of drug abuse." 

    Along Mexico's Northern border, small armies of drug cartels and gangs are invading foreign territory and facilitating human trafficking and the mass smuggling of narcotics into the United States. According to a  2006 report by the Majority Staff (Republican) of the House Homeland Security Committee, Subcommittee on Investigations, these para-military forces of organized crime are more sophisticated and dangerous than any other criminal organization in the history of U.S. law enforcement. It also mentions that they now dominate the illegal drug market and cooperate extensively with U.S. gangs. 

    The presence of these drug cartels threatens the very people that have sworn to protect their city, state, and country. According to testimony by Sheriff Sigifredo Gonzalez, Jr., Chairman of the Texas Border Sheriff's Coalition:

    "The cartels operating in Mexico and the United States have demonstrated that the weapons they possess can and will be used in protecting their caches. One informant familiar with the operations of this cartel mentioned to us that the weapons we use are water guns compared to what we will have to come up against if we ever have to. These cartels, known to frequently cross into the United States, possess and use automatic weapons, grenades, and grenade launchers. They are also experts in explosives, wiretapping, counter-surveillance, lock-picking, and GPS technology. They are able to monitor our office, home, and cellular phone conversations. The original members of this cartel were trained in the United States by our own government."

    The Mexican drug cartels are not only involved in operations in their own country and along the U.S.-Mexican border, but as NumbersUSA reports the drug cartels have lookout/ listening posts and observation posts (LP/OPs) as far as 200 miles into the United States of America. We must again focus: Mexicans are deliberately participating in espionage deep within our country, and the White House continues to ignore the fact. Working with multiple federal agencies, NumbersUSA was able to find the positions of some of the LP/OPs in the occupied territories. (See map here.)

    The 2007 AMERICAN National Drug Control Strategy begins mentioning the Southwest Border and Mexico on page 33 (out of 46) for barely one half of one page. It mentions that we can make "headway against drug trafficking in partnership with the Mexican government" and combat all of the serious threats to border security. What it doesn’t tell readers is that Mexico is unable to effectively combat the drug cartels and drug trafficking on its own land, much less assist in keeping those problems out of ours.

    This push to cooperate with war-torn Mexico in the reduction of illicit drugs and the establishment of a secure border is not just preposterous, it is irresponsible. Since Felipe Calderon was elected to office, he has been using federal officers to combat the drug cartels that wield substantial control in Mexico. As the Los Angeles Times and Indianapolis Star detailed on March 24, 2007, nearly 500 people have been reportedly killed in Mexico's civil war with the drug cartels just this year. These casualties of war more than double the number of deaths the United States military suffered in Iraq during that same period of time. Felipe Calderon even alluded to this during President Bush's recent visit to Mexico. According to CBS News, Calderon said, "Mexico can't diminish the availability of drugs, while the U.S. hasn't reduced its demand." Working together in this manner with a country that cannot even defeat the drug cartels on its own land is just plain irrational (Article 1, Article 2, Article 3) -- that is, unless we were part of some multilateral push for a common security perimeter (Link 1, Link 2.)

    The United States will never win the War on Drugs, if Americans and the Bush Administration refuse to treat it as such. The ONDCP policy -- trying to reduce drug abuse here instead of dealing seriously with the border problem -- is baloney.  Calderon’s efforts against the drug cartels must be made effective, and we should pay attention to completely securing our borders and not adding to the billions of dollars already spent each year on anti-drug education and counseling. The United States will have the ability to concentrate efforts on problems inside our country, such as home-grown drugs and prescription drug abuse, only after Mexican drug cartels and their network of armed military forces are expelled and order prevails along a fully secured Southern border.

    If the Bush Administration's idea of border security and combating drugs is bilateral commitment with the Mexican government, then it chooses to set dangerous precedent that will lead to failure. As T.J. Bonner, President of the National Border Patrol Council said in a testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the United States "needs to recognize that it cannot rely on its southern neighbor to stop the flow of illicit drugs across the southwest border, and must stop supplying financial aid to Mexico for that purpose." If the Bush Administration is serious about fighting a war on drugs, then I challenge them to prove it.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Official White House Response to "Another Bush Failure"

    Original Post from http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20274

    Response to 'Another Bush Failure'
    Mr. Ferguson presents a number of misunderstandings about drug policy and its recent results in his piece, “Another Bush Failure.”  Since 2001, teen drug use has plummeted 23%.  There are 840,000 fewer teens using drugs today than there were five years ago.  

    Past month use of meth-amphetamine is down 50% since 2001, in large part because of precursor chemical legislation and effective partnerships between the U.S. and outside countries to stop the flow of meth into our nation.  The number of toxic meth labs in the U.S. has been dramatically reduced over the past five years, and we are now working closely with Mexico to control their supply of meth and precursors.

        This progress is monitored through a variety of surveys and research.  The National Household Survey (NSDUH), the largest of its kind, monitors 12-17 year olds, as well as adults age 18 and older.  It provides data on everything from drug use patterns by gender to usage of different substances to behavioral activities while under the influence.  This and other surveys show reductions in use of every major drug -- marijuana down by 25 percent, meth by 50 percent, steroids by 20 percent, LSD and Ecstasy and alcohol and tobacco are all down.

    Random Student Drug Testing is an increasingly popular and effective tool to reduce drug use. Through the Department of Education, federal grant monies are made available to schools to implement testing programs in their communities. Over the last five fiscal years, $35.9-million has been awarded in Random Student Drug Testing grants, and the President went so far as to highlight it in his 2004 State of the Union Address, as an issue of importance.

    We are pushing back, effectively. Across the country local communities and grassroots efforts are working together on the front lines to make a difference. We will continue to work even harder and push back to reduce drug use to its lowest levels yet.  Our nation has suffered the painful consequences of illegal drug use and addiction.  The good news is that we are now making some welcome progress.


    Tom Riley
    Communications Director
    White House Office of National Drug Control Policy

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Another Bush Failure

    Comedic image for article available here (link)

    Being from Texas, President Bush should understand the cattle industry fairly well. Even an average Joe on the city sidewalk should have a similar basic understanding of herding cattle. This mutual understanding being, "One cannot effectively herd the cattle if the gate remains open." Unfortunately, President Bush has not applied this principle to his Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP).

    Yesterday, I received a copy of the National Drug Control Strategy for 2007. The Executive Office of the President is fallaciously praising Leader George W. Bush for his failed policies in securing the border and fighting the war on drugs. While reading the entire report, I forced myself to remember that propaganda will never be negative in an instance where an agency of the government is reporting on itself. The PDF can be found here (Link).

    It takes 33 pages into the report to find out that drugs come across our Southwest border. Mexico does not even have an entire page reserved for their corruption, deceit, war lords, and dependence on the economics of the USA. As I discovered, the first thing the reported notes is, "Securing our border is A top priority for the U.S. government," which is a LIE in itself, and "Across the Southwest Border in Mexico, drug trafficking and associated violence pose a grave threat not only to health and safety of the Mexican people, but TO THE SOVEREIGNTY OF MEXICO ITSELF."

    Why are we primarily addressing the heath and safety of Mexicans and the sovereignty of Mexico when the report should be addressing the health and safety of Americans and the sovereignty of the United States?

    There are many mistakes not addressed in this strategy. For a very few examples,
    1)The ONDCP does not monitor the methamphetamine imported to America
    2)The ONDCP only monitors students in the 8, 10, and 12 grade (who are not likely to be honest) on drug abuse when looking at school systems
    3) The ONDCP focuses on opium, heroin, and cocaine.
    4) The ONDCP targets schools and businesses with enough financial capital to implement a drug testing policy.
    5) I could continue for several dozen other listings, but I will stop here.

    According to the ONDCP Strategy Report, President Bush wants to address the demand side of the drug war rather than the supply side. Addressing the supply side of black market economics would force the United States to cut off the direct drug route from Central and South America into the USA across the Southern Border. The national security and sovereignty of the United States of America is at stake with Mexico. The questions George W. Bush should be answering is, "Do you plan to stop the importation of drugs into the United States? If so, do you not think that it is reasonable as a part of comprehensive immigration reform to seal the southern border to prevent the drugs from entering our country?" If not, on either question, then you are not doing your job. If we simply eliminate the drug supply, I believe drug use will begin to decrease in the United States.

    This report pats President Bush on the back for a job that he considers done well. Well, President Bush, you are wrong. This report was poorly written, compiled, and transmitted. In my personal opinion John P. Walters, Director of the Office National Drug Control Policy, should resign or be replaced. He is not seriously looking out for the sovereignty and national security of the United States of America by leaving the swinging gate to our country open for business. Nor is he preserving, protecting, nor defending "We the People" against foreign threats of drug trafficking nor the domestic threats of drug abuse.

    In my opinion, President Bush cares nothing of sealing the border. He continues to talk out of both sides of his mouth when addressing the War on Drugs and "Comprehensive Immigration Reform." If he wants to begin effecting real change in the culture of the United States, he would not propose big government solutions, as in the ONDCP report, but he would seal the border with Mexico first, a legacy he is not willing to leave for himself. President Bush, act now to close America's back gate to keep out the wolves and herd the problems we are currently facing.

    David A. Ferguson serves as President of the American Conservative Student Union
    Cross-blogged from ConservativeStudent.org (Link) from April 9, 2007
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    ACSU Releases AbsentCongress.org for February

    AbsentCongress.org is the website that tracks the voting records by attendance for the United States Congress. The Top 10 most absent Senators for 2007 are:

    Rank Name Party Score Money Owed($)
    1 Tim Johnson (D-SD) 0% $27,533.67
    2 Sam Brownback (R-KS) 56.36% $10,501.67
    3 Daniel Inouye (D-HI) 60% $9,288.25
    4 Joseph Biden (D-DE) 74.55% $7,986.50
    5 Kit Bond (R-MO) 78.18% $5,250.83
    6 John McCain (R-AZ) 87.27% $5,008.08
    7 Craig Thomas (R-WY) 80% $4,897.83
    8 Chris Dodd (D-CT) 83.64% $4,699.25
    9 Ted Stevens (R-AK) 80% $4,390.42
    10 Barbara Boxer (D-CA) 87.27% $3,485.83
    Chuck Schumer (D-NY) 87.27% $3,485.83


    Here is how the system works. United States Senators are paid $165,200 per year. The monthly salary of the Senate is divided by the number of votes accumulated in the month. For example, in the month of January, the Senate had 39 votes, and therefore each vote cost the American taxpayer $353 per Senator. A Member who missed 3 votes in January owes the American taxpayer $1059.

    Normal Americans are not afforded the privilege of being paid for work they do not do. Members of Congress must be held to that same standard. AbsentCongress.org is asking that each Member who misses a vote, repay the Department of the Treasury for their missed work.

    Eliminating government waste must start with Congressional accountability and transparency in overcompensation. According to the 2000 Census, the Median Income of an American family is $42,000 per year. Senators, alone, earn 393% more than the average US household. If Members are not able to make votes because of personal business, they must resign their post representing the people of their state.

    For the Senators and Congressmen who did not miss a vote, AbsentCongress.org will send each member a “Perfect Attendance” certificate.

    Congress has a constitutionally enumerated duty to represent their constituents through voting. Members must not be floating around the country on personal business or other Senate business when they should be fighting and scratching for every inch of representation for their constituents in the Halls of Congress. After all, what business is more official than voting?
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Did Mitt Romney Rigg the Straw Poll?

    Late last night I discovered a video that appeared on YouTube. Two scenarios can be envisioned:

    1) Mitt Romney and his staff rigged the 2007 Conservative Political Action Conference Straw Poll with paid College Republican votes
    2) A shameless person is attempting to smear the good name of the Mitt Romney and his campaign

    This video is suggesting voter fraud, but I will report this as I see it. You the reader should decide for yourself. In this video, Ryan Bilodeau, chairman of the University of Rhode Island College Republicans and organizer for the Romney Campaign, is seen rummaging through of box of materials that look very similar to the bags that were given to official CPAC registrants. Then, Jordan Sekulow, a Romney staffer is seen hurriedly walking though the CPAC Exhibition Hall with a handful of CPAC badges to give volunteers. Sekulow is the son of syndicated radio host, Jay Sekulow, and he is the former Students for Bush Campaign Director from 2004. This concoction makes a poor attempt at linking the actions of Ryan Bilodeau to Jordan Sekulow. Bilodeau and Sekulow appear innocent, but the attempt may hold validity. Watch and decide.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV0Hwqr09n4

    It is also alleged that the Mitt Romney for President Campaign spent in the upwards of $20,000 accommodating students for CPAC 2007 with travel, lodging, registration fees, and other expenses in exchange for volunteering for the weekend and a supporter reception. For 24 hours a day, one could see the Romney army of Republican students everywhere from the hotel lobby, exhibition halls, stairwells, local restaurants, and a couple of the local bars hosting College Republican drunk fests. Romney, Romney, Romney everywhere. It seemed that way because, in essence, Mitt Romney for President WAS everywhere.
    The Mitt Romney for President Campaign clearly out worked and out paid opponents like Sam Brownback, Jim Gilmore, and Tom Tancredo. This Bostonian was playing hardball like the New York Yankees. The Romney Camp is believed to have used every financial means possible to procure the CPAC 2007 straw poll pennant, a comparatively trifling title on the way to the big show.

    Unfortunately, the talk of a Conservative candidate at CPAC was not about Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, or Sam Brownback. The natural buzz among the real Conservatives was about the field of dark horse candidates, primarily the former Governor of Virginia James Gilmore, while secondarily speaking of the former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and Congressman Tom Tancredo. This fact proves that a couple of hundred restless College Republicans will not and should not influence the future of the United States of America in a single straw poll with an artificial murmur of campaign rhetoric. As for me, I do not think that the CPAC 2007 straw poll held, holds, or will hold much water in the 2008 presidential primaries simply because campaign organization will never prevail over the power of ideas and individual investigation.

    This video is an example of the culture of corruption that extends far beyond Capitol Hill's Republican Party. This culture of corruption can be seen at all levels of the GOP, even the college campus. First, if the insinuation is true, and the straw poll was rigged, corruption exists. Secondly, corruption might exist from an opposing inner-partisan campaign attempting to smear the good name and reputation of a worthy opponent. Either way, corruption exists in some way, shape, form, or fashion in this exhibition of ill-will. Richard Vigueries CPAC suggestion just might be plausible. Maybe the Republican Party should be as the Old Testament Hebrews in so much as a dormant force wandering in the desert until the corrupt leaders are eradicated.
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    ACSU Releases Immigration Platform

    On March 5, 2007, the American Conservative Student Union released its official platform on Immigration, Illegal Immigration, and Temporary Worker Programs. The position reads as follows:

    As Conservatives, the American Conservative Student Union recognizes that the United States is established on principles which encourage immigration and promote the transformation of immigrants into Americans. The purpose of immigration policy is to benefit U.S. citizens. Therefore, when establishing such policy, the United States must take into account five principles.

    First and foremost, immigration must be consistent with the rule of law. Our immigration laws must be consistently enforced in all situations and immigration must be done legally. Those who violate our immigration laws must not be rewarded with any form of legal status or benefits. (Click here to continue reading.)

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Brownback Leads the Field in Missed Votes

    Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., has been playing an awful lot of hooky these days. Last month, he missed more than half of his Senate roll call votes, according to AbsentCongress.org, a  Web site launched Thursday that tracks senatorial absenteeism.

    Only Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., who remains hospitalized after a life-threatening brain hemorrhage, has missed more. Johnson, who staffers say is making steady progress in his recovery, hasn't made it to any votes yet.

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2782.html
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »